Appeal No. 96-3920 Application 08/151,891 Thus, the abstract is clearly not an accurate abstract of the actual disclosure of the German document, and cannot be fairly relied upon. Moreover, a fair reading of the abstract reveals to us that it neither infers nor suggests a "flexible" housing. For these reasons, we believe it quite appropriate to say that the German document does not disclose a (flexible) housing upon which (manual) pressure can be exerted by a user to exude coloring through the pen. As to the other applied teachings, we find that they reveal relevant aspects of the claimed invention but collectvely would not have overcome the deficiency of the German document or have been suggestive of appellants’ invention. Of particular significance is the Gaines patent. The patentee Gaines overcomes a problem comparable to the problem addressed by 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007