Ex parte BONISSONE et al. - Page 14




          Appeal No. 96-4014                                                          
          Application 08/192,939                                                      

               (3) generating a single output value derived from                      
          an aggregation of control variable values                                   
               Appellants further argue (Brief, page 9):                              
               [T]he role of the MPU [in Hisano] is to request execution              
               about a proposition to the highest ranked child fuzzy                  
               reasoning computer FC .  Hisano does not disclose or suggest           
                                    a                                                 
               that the MPU be used to aggregate control variable values as           
               in the claimed invention.                                              
          The examiner states that "Hisano teaches on [sic] figure 1, an              
          aggregation of output values from lower level controllers to                
          generate a single output value in order to control a system"                
          (Examiner's Answer, page 6).                                                
               As discussed, because the MPU executes a fuzzy logic                   
          reasoning together with fuzzy computer 2, the MPU and FC 2 act              
          together as a fuzzy logic controller even if the MPU alone is not           
          a fuzzy computer.  FC 2 aggregates control variable values (e.g.,           
          figures 10, 11, and 16).  Although the examiner's reliance on the           
          MPU alone as a fuzzy controller is misplaced, we think that the             
          fuzzy logic teachings of Hisano are apparent.  Hisano teaches               
          that the system can be used for control (col. 3, lines 3-6),                
          which suggests that the fuzzy logic can be applied to aggregate             
          control variables.                                                          
                                          2.                                          
               Appellants argue that "the admitted prior art fails to                 
          disclose or suggest teachings directed to the claimed limitations           

                                       - 14 -                                         





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007