Paper No. 21
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte HANS VONDRACEK
and HEINZ KROBER
______________
Appeal No. 96-4172
Application 08/098,5941
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
ABRAMS and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
16, 17, 19 through 22 and 28 through 30. These are the only
claims remaining in the application.2
1Application for patent filed July 28, 1993.
2As far as can be determined by the Board, a response
to the final rejection was received August 30, 1995, from
appellants. The response was responded to by the examiner
(continued...)
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007