Ex parte PETERSON - Page 4





          Appeal No. 96-4189                                                          
          Application 08/279,157                                                      



                    8.  A security system comprising a number of sensors for sensing  
          an alarm condition, a control panel for receiving signals from said sensors 
          and processing the same for determination of an alarm event, an interior    
          keypad for inputting information to said control panel, said security system
          further comprising a wireless remote control arrangement having a portable  
          unit to be carried by a user  and an interior receiver arrangement for      
          receiving signals from said portable unit and communicating with said control
          panel to alter the status of the security system including arming and disarm-
          ing of the security system; said portable unit including at least one key   
          actuator and means to generate and transmit a predetermined IR signal in    
          response to actuation of said at least one key actuator, said receiver      
          arrangement upon receipt of said predetermined IR signal  from said portable
          unit providing visual feedback to the user to assist the user in the entry of
          an identification code produced by means of a series of IR signals produced by
          multiple actuation of said at least one key actuator and to also assist the 
          user in the entry of instructions to alter the status of the security system,
          said interior receiver upon receipt of said IR signals to alter the status of
          the security system instructing said control panel to change the status  of 
          the security system in accordance with said received IR signals.            

                    The Examiner relies on the following references:                  
          Lewiner et al. (Lewiner)              4,692,762    Sept.  8,                
          1987                                                                        
          van den Boom et al. (van den Boom)    4,723,121    Feb.   2,                
          1988                                                                        
          Jacob                                 4,908,604    Mar.  13,                
          1990                                                                        


                    Claims 8 through 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Jacob in view of Lewiner and               
          van den Boom.                                                               





                                          4                                           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007