THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte CHARLES A. GIBSON
________________
Appeal No. 97-0113
Application No. 08/083,9871
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge, McKELVEY, Senior
Administrative Patent Judge, and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judge.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134
This appeal is from a decision of the primary examiner
rejecting claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over (1) the combined disclosures of Niebruegge
et al. (U.S. Patent No. 4,731,165) and Latimer (U.S. Patent No.
4,956,506); and (2) the combined disclosures of Moss et al. (U.S.
1Application for patent filed June 28, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007