Ex parte ROSENBERG - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 10           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                              Ex parte PERETZ ROSENBERG                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                 Appeal No. 97-0690                                   
                             Application No. 08/375,0941                              
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          According to appellant’s Notice of Appeal (Paper No. 7,                     
          filed May 16, 1996), this appeal is from the examiner's final               
          rejection of claims 1 through 20.  We note, however, that in                



               Application for patent filed January 19, 1995. According to appellant,1                                                                     
          this application is a continuation-in-part of application 08/138,285, filed 
          October 20, 1993, now U.S. Patent No. 5,390,850, issued February 21, 1995.  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007