Ex parte LOPEZ et al. - Page 3




                Appeal No. 97-0747                                                                                                            
                Application 08/443,258                                                                                                        


                appellants state that “[w]ith respect to the issue on appeal, claims 15-21 and 23-27 stand or fall                            

                together” (page 3).  Thus, for purposes of this appeal, claims 15 through 21, 23 through 25 and 27 shall                      

                stand or fall with representative claim 26.                                                                                   

                         Of particular importance to the issues presented in this appeal is the disclosure of Neckerman,                      

                the examiner’s primary reference.  Neckerman relates to knit cuffs for garments such as surgical gowns.                       

                Figure 8 shows a pair of such cuffs 24 attached to the sleeves of surgical gown 26.  Each cuff includes                       

                a two-ply front section 12, a single-ply middle section 14 and a two-ply back section 16.  In the                             

                example described in columns 3 and 4, the front section is about 2 to 2½ inches long, the middle                              

                section is about 2 inches long and the back section is about 1 inch long.  The front, middle and back                         

                sections are knit together on a circular knitting machine in one continuous step to form a discrete                           

                integral cuff which does not require any subsequent cutting or folding to achieve a finished state (see                       

                column 1, lines 42 through 53; and column 2, lines 57 through 65).  As described by Neckerman,                                

                         [o]nce the present invention cuff has been knit no further steps have to be taken to finish                          
                         the cuff.  The present invention neither has to be cut nor folded to arrive at a finished                            
                         cuff.  This is not so with prior art because the prior art fabric must be cut or trimmed                             
                         and then folded over onto itself to make a finished cuff.  A distinct disadvantage.                                  

                                 The present invention is also more economical to produce than prior art                                      
                         because it takes fewer process steps to end up with finished material.  Additionally, the                            
                         back section of the present invention permits the cuff to be readily secured to a garment                            
                         without further preparation.  This is due to the fact that the back section once knit has a                          
                         finished edge which facilitates attachment to a garment.  Prior art on the other hand has                            
                         to take an additional step to trim the cuff to size and then attach the cuff to a garment                            
                         [column 3, lines 17 through 34].                                                                                     

                                                                      3                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007