THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PAUL J. SERBIAK, ANNAMARIA CESCO-CANCIAN,
JULIE K. FREDRICK and ROBERT J. PEERENBOOM
__________
Appeal No. 97-1027
Application No. 08/218,9541
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before McCANDLISH Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
McQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 30 and 32 through 42. No other claims are
1Application for patent filed March 28, 1994. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
No. 08/048,640, filed April 16, 1993, abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/811,388,filed December 20,
1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,219,341, issued March 28, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007