Ex parte FRANCIS et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 97-1142                                                          
          Application 08/260,831                                                      


          of about 14.5 ft., it would have been obvious to dimension the              
          motion base and housing of Trumbull ‘256 to allow it to be                  
          installed and fully operational in a building with 15 foot                  
          ceilings.                                                                   
                                       Summary                                        
               The standing rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.              
          New rejections pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) have been made.                
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to           
          37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule             
          notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off.              
          Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR              
          § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not be           
          considered final for purposes of judicial review.”                          
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN             
          TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of              
          the following two options with respect to the new ground of                 
          rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (§ 1.197(c)) as to            
          the rejected claims:                                                        
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims                 
               so rejected or a showing of facts relating to the                      
               claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                       
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    


                                         -8-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007