Ex parte HERMANNS et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-1144                                                          
          Application 08/326,608                                                      




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to             
          allow claims 4 and 7 through 13.  Claims 5 and 6, the only other            
          claims remaining in the application, stand objected to by the               
          examiner, but are otherwise indicated to be allowable if                    
          rewritten in independent form.                                              


                    Appellants’ invention pertains to an improvement in a             
          textile bobbin winding machine.  An understanding of the inven-             
          tion can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy             
          of which appears in the appendix to appellants’ brief.                      


                    As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied              
          the patents listed below:                                                   
          O’Brien                       3,393,879      Jul. 23, 1968                  
          Nel                      4,716,648          Jan.  5, 1988                   
          Prodi et al. (Prodi)          5,056,724          Oct. 15, 1991              


                    The following rejections are before us for review.                


                    Claims 7 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Prodi in view of Nel.                      
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007