Ex parte MOWRY - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-1166                                                          
          Application 08/198,848                                                      


               first, second, and third electrical contacts spatially                 
          positioned on the giant magnetoresistive element and along the              
          first track such that a first current path having a first                   
          variable resistance is formed between the first and second                  
          electrical contacts and a second current path having a second               
          variable resistance is formed between the first and third                   
          electrical contacts; and                                                    
               wherein a first magnetic field representing information                
          from the first track passes the first, second and third                     
          electrical contacts at different times causing a change in the              
          first variable resistance in the first current path when the                
          first magnetic field becomes positioned substantially underneath            
          the first current path, and wherein the first magnetic field                
          causes a change in the second variable resistance in the second             
          current path when the first field becomes positioned                        
          substantially underneath the second current path.                           
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Garnier et al. (Garnier)      3,855,625          Dec. 17, 1974              
          Miura                         4,179,720          Dec. 18, 1979              
          Mowry                         4,851,944          July 25, 1989              
          Hitachi                       0 490 327          June 17, 1992              
          (European Patent Application)                                               
          IBM, “Longitudinal Read Sensor For Magnetic Disks,” IBM Technical           
          Disclosure Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 3B, August 1990, pages 209-211.           
          Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                       
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers IBM in view of                  
          Hitachi, Miura and Mowry with respect to claims 1-9, 19 and 20,             
          and adds Garnier with respect to claims 10-18.                              
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answers for the           
          respective details thereof.                                                 

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007