Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte CHRISTENSON - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1998 > Ex parte CHRISTENSON - Page 1

                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                Paper No. 16                            
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                 Ex parte RONALD E. CHRISTENSON                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 97-1175                                                                           
                                                    Application No. 08/383,3611                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before CALVERT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     




                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to                                                                         
                 allow claims 3, 8, 11 to 14 and 16 to 20, as amended                                                                                   





                          1Application for patent filed February 3, 1995.                                                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007