Ex parte GAMMINO - Page 3




                Appeal No. 97-1200                                                                                                            
                Application No. 08/200,945                                                                                                    


                         Claim 26 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it                                                            
                reads as follows:                                                                                                             
                         26. Telecommunications apparatus for selectively preventing                                                          
                establishment of a telephone call to a telephone number having a                                                              
                central office exchange code, said telecommunications apparatus                                                               
                being capable of receiving a transmitted dialing sequence which                                                               
                includes a first plurality of dialing signals, followed by a                                                                  
                second plurality of dialing signals followed by a third plurality                                                             
                of dialing signals, wherein said telephone call is placed through                                                             
                a telecommunications switch, said telecommunications apparatus                                                                
                comprising:                                                                                                                   
                         means for receiving said dialing sequence prior to receiving                                                         
                said central office exchange code;                                                                                            
                         means for evaluating said third plurality of dialing signals                                                         
                and for preventing said telecommunications switch from                                                                        
                establishing said telephone call if                                                                                           
                                 said evaluated third plurality of dialing signals are                                                        
                determined to a) be in a location in said dialing sequence to                                                                 
                accomplish international dialing, and b) be respective                                                                        
                predetermined signals which are used for international dialing                                                                
                irrespective of said second plurality of dialing signals.                                                                     
                         The reference relied on by the examiner in the remaining                                                             
                rejection is:                                                                                                                 
                Bimonte et al. (Bimonte)  4,577,066                                                 Mar. 18, 1986                             
                         Claims 26 and 28 through 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                           
                § 103 as being unpatentable over Bimonte.2                                                                                    



                         2Although FCC Regulations are not listed in the references                                                           
                of record, the examiner does, however, discuss them in the                                                                    
                grounds of the rejection.                                                                                                     
                                                                      3                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007