Paper No. 34
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ULF WEISSENBERGER
and ANDREAS WEISSENBERGER
______________
Appeal No. 97-1224
Application 08/445,866 1
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges .
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge .
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 2, 4, 5, 7-9 and 11-13, which constituted all of
Application for patent filed May 22, 1995. According to appellants,1
this application is a continuation of Application 08/151,804, filed November
15, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007