THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DOUGLAS W. ANDERSON
____________
Appeal No. 97-1254
Application 08/309,2831
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, LEE and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed September 20, 1994.1
According to appellant, this application is a division of
Application 08/077,901 filed June 18, 1993, which is a division
of Application 07/850,191 filed March 11, 1992, now Patent No.
5,231,538 issued July 27, 1993, which is a division of
Application 07/742,563 filed August 7, 1991, now Patent No.
5,220,452 issued June 15, 1993, which is a continuation of
Application 07/563,370 filed August 6, 1990.
Page: 1 2 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007