THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MICHAEL S. LIU
and JAMES C. LAI
_______________
Appeal No. 97-1387
Application 08/251,0111
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 4. Claims 5 through 102 have been indicated
by the examiner as being directed to allowable subject matter
and are not on appeal before us.
1 Application for patent filed May 31, 1994. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/997,864, filed December 29, 1992, now abandoned.
2 A rejection of claims 6 and 8 through 10 under 35 U.S.C.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007