THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EUGENE A. SWAIN, STANLEY J. PIETRZYKOWSKI, JR.
MARK C. PETROPOULOS and ALAN D. SMITH
_____________
Appeal No. 97-1494
Application 08/395,2141
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to
allow claims 1, 2, 4 through 7, 9, 10, 14 and 19 as amended
subsequent to the final rejection in a paper filed May 22, 1996
(Paper No. 7). Claims 15 through 18 stand allowed.
Application for patent filed February 27, 1995.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007