Ex parte LONG - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        

                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                Paper No. 17                            
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                        Ex parte JAMES M. LONG                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 97-1691                                                                           
                                                    Application No. 08/519,3751                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Judge, MEISTER and                                                                            
                 ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                  
                 MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                  


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           






                          1Application for patent filed Aug 25, 1995.  According to                                                                     
                 appellant, this application is a continuation of Application                                                                           
                 08/227,432 filed April 14, 1994, now U.S. Patent No. 5,459,982                                                                         
                 issued October 24, 1995.                                                                                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007