Ex parte WISNIEWSKI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-2224                                                          
          Application 08/510,613                                                      


          quickly and effortlessly mounting a fuel filter to the fuel                 
          system of a vehicle” (specification, page 1).  Copies of the                
          appealed claims appear in the appendix to the appellant’s                   
          brief (Paper No. 6).                                                        
               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Tinnerman                          2,423,627           Jul.  8,             
          1947                                                                        
          Mowatt                        3,047,648           Jul. 31, 1962             
          Shelton et al. (Shelton)           3,227,406           Jan.  4,             
          1966                                                                        
          Conrad                        4,650,144           Mar. 17, 1987             
          Ward                               5,016,843           May  21,             
          1991                                                                        
          Twork, Sr. et al. (Twork)     5,121,894           Jun. 16, 1992             
               The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as follows:                                                                 
               a) claims 1 and 6 through 11 as being unpatentable over                
          Twork in view of Conrad and Mowatt;                                         
               b) claim 2 as being unpatentable over Twork in view of                 
          Conrad, Mowatt and Shelton;                                                 
               c) claim 3 as being unpatentable over Twork in view of                 
          Conrad, Mowatt, Shelton and Tinnerman;                                      
               d) claim 5 as being unpatentable over Twork in view of                 
          Conrad, Mowatt and Ward;                                                    
                                          -2-                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007