Ex parte THELLER - Page 10




                Appeal No. 97-2451                                                                               Page 10                      
                Application No. 08/260,635                                                                                                    


                New ground of rejection                                                                                                       
                         Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), we enter the                                                              
                following new ground of rejection.5                                                                                           


                         Claims 1 to 8 and 13 to 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                              
                § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to                                                                   
                particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention.                                                                    


                         As set forth previously, our review of the specification                                                             
                leads us to conclude that one of ordinary skill in the art would                                                              
                not be able to understand the metes and bounds of the                                                                         
                terminologies "substantially below" and "rapidly remove" in                                                                   
                independent claim 1.  Likewise, one of ordinary skill in the art                                                              
                would not be able to understand the metes and bounds of the                                                                   
                terminology "substantially below" in independent claim 16.                                                                    
                Additionally, we conclude that one of ordinary skill in the art                                                               
                would not be able to understand the metes and bounds of the                                                                   
                terminology "substantially higher" in dependent claim 13 since                                                                



                         537 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final                                                          
                rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53131, 53197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off.                                                             
                Gaz. Pat. Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)) permits the Board to                                                                
                reject any pending claim including allowed and objected to                                                                    
                claims.                                                                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007