THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARJORIE G. HARPER and PATRICK M. BERTSCH
____________
Appeal No. 97-2562
Application No. 08/492,2411
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 20 to 30, 32 to 35 and 37 to 40. Claim 36 2
has been objected to as depending from a non allowed claim.
Claims 1 to 19 and 31 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed June 19, 1995. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/942,423, filed September 9, 1992, now U.S. Patent No.
5,575,530.
2Claims 32 and 33 were amended subsequent to the final
rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007