Appeal No. 97-2644 Application 08/381,531 § 102(b), we note that independent claim 1 defines the con- necting pin as comprising, inter alia, a plurality of core elements, with each of said core elements being rigid, and having a cylindrical shape extending along its length measured between opposite ends thereof, which length is greater than the distance between at least two adjacent ones of the coupling eyelets. Claim 1 further sets forth that the connecting pin includes at least one casing element in which said core ele- ments are closely received and retained in an end-to-end relationship "to position each of said core elements through more than two adjacent ones of the coupling eyelets" (emphasis added). Looking at Figures 1 and 2 of the application draw- ings and at appellant's specification (e.g., pages 1 through 3), we observe that the core elements or pieces (2) are de- scribed as being made of "high strength solid material" and as being "cylindrical in shape." In addition, it is appellant's stated intention that each of the core elements or pieces (2) 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007