THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL A. GOMPERTZ
and
ART B. DAWSON
____________
Appeal No. 97-2650
Application No. 08/489,2571
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 12 through 14 and 17 through 19, which are
all of the claims pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed June 14, 1995. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 08/381,016, filed January 30, 1995, now abandoned, which was
a continuation of Application No. 08/025,105, filed March 2,
1993, now abandoned.
2Claims 13, 14 and 17 through 19 were amended subsequent to
the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007