Ex parte LUBURIC et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2712                                                          
          Application 08/285,349                                                      








                    The following rejections are before us for review.                


                    Claims 1 through 14, 16, 17, 19 through 22, and 24                
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over             
          the French Patent in view of Chadwick.                                      


                    Claim 23 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being           
          unpatentable over the French Patent in view of Chadwick, as                 
          applied above, further in view of Koefelda.                                 


                    The full text of the examiner's rejections and response           
          to the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer               
          (Paper No. 17), while the complete statement of appellants’                 
          argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 16).                          


                                       OPINION                                        




                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007