Ex parte SCHULTZ et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)               
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                  
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                             Paper No. 25              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    _____________                                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                      
                  Ex parte ROBERT K. SCHULTZ, CONSTANTINOS SIOUTAS                     
                                    _____________                                      
                                  Appeal No. 97-2736                                   
                               Application 08/067,2211                                 
                                    ______________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                     

          Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT and STAAB, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                      
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal                     
          to allow claims 1 through 9 as amended subsequent to the final               
          rejection in a paper filed March 23, 1995 (Paper No. 9).                     
          Claims 1 through 9 are all of the claims remaining in the                    

               Application for patent filed May 26, 1993.1                                                                      
                                          1                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007