Ex parte TRINCHERO et al. - Page 5




                Appeal No. 97-2820                                                                                                            
                Application No. 08/432,443                                                                                                    


                         Naiki discloses two electrodes G3 and G4 (Figure 7) that are                                                         
                each formed from a first part 40 with a single aperture 50                                                                    
                therein, and a second part 60 positioned within the first part                                                                
                40.  The second part 60 includes three inline apertures 70B, 70G,                                                             
                and 70R.  A continuous flange 64 (Figure 6) on the second part 60                                                             
                is connected to a continuous flange 44 (Figure 5) on the first                                                                
                part 40.  Thus, the two parts 40 and 60 are connected to each                                                                 
                other along one continuous ledge  (Figure 7).         2                                                                       
                         According to the examiner (Answer, page 5), Hernqvist                                                                
                discloses “a cup shaped part 22 with ledges (see FIG. 5, support                                                              
                portions 80) and an aperture plate with offsets (eyelets 96) for                                                              
                attaching an auxiliary electrode member (see col. 4, line 11-12,                                                              
                shield member 86) to the main electrode 22.”  The examiner is of                                                              
                the belief that “[i]t would have been obvious to use a cup shaped                                                             
                part with ledges for attaching an auxiliary electrode member with                                                             
                offsets, as disclosed by Hernqvist et al., instead of the side                                                                
                wall member, as disclosed by Naiki, as a design expedient”                                                                    
                (Answer, page 5).                                                                                                             



                         2The examiner has not addressed the issue of whether it                                                              
                would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to                                                                
                use a continuous ledge connection in lieu of the claimed                                                                      
                connection at the four spaced ledges and four corners.                                                                        
                                                                      5                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007