Ex parte MOLTER - Page 16




          Appeal No. 97-2822                                                          
          Application 08/455,900                                                      



                    37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,               
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exer-                 
          cise one of the following two options with respect to the new               
          ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37 CFR             
          § 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                      
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                        
                    claims so rejected or a showing of facts                          
                    relating to the claims so rejected, or both,                      
                    and have the matter reconsidered by the                           
                    examiner, in which event the application will                     
                    be remanded to the examiner. . . .                                
                    (2) Request that the application be                               
                    reheard under § 1.197(b) by the Board of                          
                    Patent Appeals and Interferences upon the                         
                    same record. . . .                                                


                    Should the appellant elect to prosecute further before            
          the Primary Examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(1), in order             
          to preserve the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C. §§ 141 or              
          145 with respect to the affirmed rejection, the effective date of           
          the affirmance is deferred until conclusion of the prosecution              
          before the examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited               
          prosecution, the affirmed rejection is overcome.                            


                    If the appellant elects prosecution before the examiner           
          and this does not result in allowance of the application,                   
                                          16                                          





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007