Ex parte TINHORN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-3197                                         Page 2           
          Application No. 08/418,021                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a music emitting                  
          pillow.  A copy of claims 5 through 8 is attached to the appendix           
          to the appellant's brief.                                                   


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner as evidence of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:              
          Boos                     2,940,088                June 14, 1960             
          Ramey                    4,228,793                Oct. 21, 1980             
          Fry                      4,862,438                Aug. 29, 1989             
          Johenning                5,392,478                Feb. 28, 1995             



               Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                  
          paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point            
          out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellant             
          regards as the invention.                                                   


               Claims 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being           
          unpatentable over Boos in view of Fry and Ramey.                            


               Claims 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being           
          unpatentable over Fry in view of Boos and Ramey.                            









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007