Ex parte ARGENT - Page 12




          Appeal No. 97-3345                                                          
          Application 08/332,936                                                      



          iron pipes; column 8, lines 56 through 61) and Nemoto (cast                 
          iron or steel pipes;  column 1, lines 13 and 14) are viewed as              
          representative of the knowledge in the art of the known method              
          of trenchless excavation pipelaying, as acknowledged by                     
          appellant (specification, pages 2 and 3).                                   


                    Considering the applied teachings as a whole, we                  
          conclude, as did the examiner, that it would have been obvious              
          to practice the invention of McGugan with the pipes being                   
          placed horizontally in the earth.  It readily appears to us                 
          that the incentive on the part of one having ordinary skill in              
          the art  for making this modification would have simply been                
          to gain    the expected benefits of the well-known trenchless               
          excavation method.                                                          


                    The argument in the brief (pages 20 through 22) is                
          not convincing of the patentability of claim 35.  Akin to our               
          analysis of the patents to Sweeney and St. Onge, supra, we                  





                                          12                                          





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007