THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JAMES D. SAMPICA,
MELVIN L. CAMPBELL, C. JOHN ANDERSON,
AND DUANE SCHLATTER
_______________
Appeal No. 97-3474
Application 08/431,2111
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 4 through 7 and 11 through 14. Claim 3 has been
canceled and claims 8 through 10, 15 and 16 have been indicated
by the examiner as being allowable.
The invention pertains to liquid crystal displays and, more
particularly, to a liquid crystal display [LCD] laminated with a
silicon gel adhesive to which optical components are attached.
1 Application for patent filed April 28, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007