Ex parte SASAKI et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 97-3918                                                          
          Application 08/447,901                                                      


          re Wands, 858 F.2d 731, 737, 8 USPQ2d 1400, 1404 (Fed. Cir.                 
          1988).                                                                      
               Appellants' specification explains that the time                       
          intervals T1 and T2 can be determined by "counting the actual               
          time by using a CPU provided in the R/W [Read/Write] IC . . ."              
          (Spec. at 19:12-14).  The examiner has not alleged that, let                
          alone explained why, one skilled in the art would have                      
          required undue experimentation to generate the timing signals               
          T1 and T2 in this manner.  We are therefore reversing the §                 
          112 rejection of claim 2 and also the rejection of claim 9,                 
          which was rejected under § 112 simply because of its                        
          dependence on claim 2.                                                      
















                                       - 10 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007