THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte UDO SCHUTZ
_____________
Appeal No. 97-4168
Application 08/348,8901
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge,
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to
allow claims 7 through 9 as amended subsequent to the final
rejection in a paper filed January 14, 1997 (Paper No. 12).
Claims 7 through 9 are all of the claims remaining in the
application, claims 1 through 6 having been canceled.
Application for patent filed November 25, 1994.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007