Ex parte GOULAIT - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-4184                                                          
          Application No. 08/521,256                                                  


               This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner                    
          finally rejecting claims 1-5 and 21-23, which constitute all                
          of the claims remaining of record in the application.                       
               The appellant's invention is directed to a fastening                   
          system.                                                                     
          The subject matter before us on appeal is illustrated by                    
          reference to claim 1, which reads as follows:                               
               1.   A fastening system releasably attachable to and in                
          combination with a complementary receiving surface, said                    
          fastening system comprising a bilaterally staggered array of                
          free formed prongs joined at a base to an elastically                       
          extensible substrate prestrained to thereby increase the                    
          density of said prongs, said prongs extending outwardly from                
          said substrate along a shank to an engaging means, said pre-                
          strained substrate comprising a generally planar sheet of                   
          material and having a relaxation-extension area ratio in one                
          direction of at least about 6.0, a five second recovery of at               
          least 50%, and a spring rate of less than 500 grams per inch                
          of width, whereby said prongs and said pre-strained substrate               
          apply a preload when attached to said complementary receiving               
          surface.                                                                    


                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
               The references relied upon by the examiner to support the              
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Aeschbach et al. (Aeschbach)            4,628,709           Dec.            
          16, 1986                                                                    
          Noel et al. (Noel)                 5,032,122           Jul. 16,             
          1991                                                                        
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007