Ex parte WOLFF et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-4258                                                          
          Application No. 08/429,966                                                  




             This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally              
          rejecting claims 14-18, 35 and 36.  Claim 19 has been allowed,              
          claims 1-13 and 20-34 have been canceled, and claims 37-45                  
          have been withdrawn as being directed to a nonelected                       
          invention.                                                                  
               The appellants’ invention is directed to a device for                  
          local intraluminal administration of drugs.  The subject                    
          matter before us on appeal is illustrated by reference to                   
          claim 14, which has been reproduced in an appendix to the                   
          Appeal Brief.                                                               


                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
               The references relied upon by the examiner to support the              
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Pinchuk                       5,019,090                May 28,              
          1991                                                                        
          Palmaz                        5,102,417                Apr. 7,              
          1992                                                                        



                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 14-16, 18, 35 and 36 stand rejected under 35                    
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007