THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PATRICK HENGL
__________
Appeal No. 97-4406
Application No. 08/436,2551
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS and
NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 1, 2, 14, 15 and 26. Claims 5 and 16-25 have
been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-
elected species (Paper No. 7). Claims 3, 4, 6-13 and 27-29 have
1Application for patent filed May 15, 1995. According to
appellant, this application is the national stage application of
PCT/FR93/01107, filed November 13, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007