Appeal No. 98-0430
Application 08/688,141
Before COHEN, ABRAMS and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner
to allow claims 9 through 12, as amended subsequent to the
final rejection. These claims constitute all of the claims
remaining in the application. 2
Appellant’s invention pertains to a baseball or
soft- ball pocket forming tool. An understanding of the
invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 9,
a copy of which appears in APPENDIX A of the reply brief
(Paper No. 15).
2Based upon the explicit statement in the answer (page 2)
that claims 1 through 8 were canceled, it appears to us that
the amendment canceling claims 2 through 4, attached to the
main brief (Paper No. 13), was entered by the examiner, al-
though no notation to that effect appears on the referenced
amendment.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007