THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte BRUCE MATTHEWS
_____________
Appeal No. 98-0673
Application 08/723,3551
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner's final rejection of claims 6-11 in the involved
reissue application. The original patent contains claims 1-5.
The Rejection on Appeal
1Reissue Application filed September 30, 1996, for
Patent No. 5,435,388, filed August 17, 1994, which according
to the appellant is a divisional application of Application
08/051,854, filed April 26, 1993, now Patent No. 5,361,840.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007