Ex parte HERCEG et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 98-1693                                                          
          Application D-07/343,182                                                    



          line placed around an icon, in our view, does not constitute                
          an embodiment of the icon design in an article of manufacture.              
          In this regard, we direct attention to Strijland at 26 USPQ2d               
          1263, wherein that panel of the Board indicated that:                       
               It should be noted, however, we do not think that                      
               merely illustrating a picture displayed on the                         
               screen of a computer or other display device, such                     
               as a television or movie screen, is sufficient,                        
               alone, to convert a picture into a design for an                       
               article of manufacture.  Mere display of a picture                     
               on a screen is not significantly different, in our                     
               view, from the display of a picture on a piece of                      
               paper.  Only the medium of display is different.                       
          Note, also, the special concurrence by Examiner-In-Chief                    
          Stahl, at 12 USPQ2d 1264-1266.                                              
               We have sustained both the rejection under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          112, first paragraph, and the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 171.              
               Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed.                      












                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007