UEMURA et al. V. PRYOR - Page 2




          Interference No. 103,408                                                    


                           Patent Interference No. 103,408                            
                                    ______________                                    
                                      JUDGMENT                                        
                                    _____________                                     

          METZ, PATE, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                       
          MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge                                         
                    Uemura et al. have filed a written concession of                  
          priority as to the subject matter of counts 1 and 2.                        
          Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered against Uemura et                   
          al.'s   claims that correspond to those count, i.e., patent                 
          claims 1-4, which means Uemura et al. are not entitled to a                 
          patent including those claims.  Judgment is awarded in favor                
          of Pryor's claims that correspond to the counts, i.e.,                      
          application claims 26-33, which means he is entitled to a                   
          patent including those claims.                                              


                                                  )                                   
                         __________________________ )                                 
                              ANDREW H. METZ             )                            
                              Administrative Patent Judge)                            
                                                  )                                   
                                                       )         BOARD                
          OF                                                                          
                         __________________________ ) PATENT                          
          APPEALS                                                                     
                              WILLIAM F. PATE, III       )      AND                   
                              Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES              
                                          - 2 -                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007