Interference No. 103,343
al.’s claims that correspond to the count (i.e., claims 34-
66), which means Chin et al. are not entitled to a patent
including those claims. Therefore, judgment on the issue of
priority is awarded in favor of Kieturakis’s claims that
correspond to the count (i.e., claims 73, 74, and 76-80).
This award of priority, coupled with the denial of Chin et
al.’s 37 CFR § 1.633(a) motion in our decision mailed
September 17, 1998, means Kieturakis is entitled to a patent
including those claims.
)
__________________________ )
BRUCE H. STONER, JR., Chief)
Administrative Patent Judge)
)
) BOARD
OF
__________________________ ) PATENT
APPEALS
JOHN C. MARTIN ) AND
Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES
)
)
__________________________ )
ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON )
Administrative Patent Judge)
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007