MOSS et al. V. DORNER et al. - Page 2




          Interference No. 103,779                                                    


               Dorner et al., the senior party, have filed a concession of            
          priority which, pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), is treated as a              
          request for entry of an adverse judgment as to all claims which             
          correspond to the count.                                                    
               Accordingly, judgment as to the subject matter of the                  
          count in issue is hereby awarded to Bernard Moss and                        
          Michael J. Merchlinsky, the junior party.  Friedrich Dorner,                
          Friedrich Scheiflinger, Falko Gunter Falkner and                            
          Michael Pfleiderer, the senior party, are not entitled to a                 
          patent containing claims 50-52, 74, 76, 78 to 84, 97 and 100                
          to 113.                                                                     


                         STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR.     )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         MICHAEL SOFOCLEOUS            ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         MARY F. DOWNEY                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              








                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007