THOMSON et al v. BUCHARDT et al - Page 2




          Interference No. 103,889                                                    


                                      JUDGMENT                                        
               Thomson et al., the junior party, have filed an express                
          abandonment of their involved application, which, pursuant to               
          37 CFR § 1.662(a), is treated as a request for entry of an                  
          adverse judgment as to all claims which correspond to the count.            
               Accordingly, judgment as to the subject matter of the count            
          in issue is hereby awarded to Ole Buchardt, Michael Egholm,                 
          Peter E. Nielsen and Rolf H. Berg, the senior party.                        
          Stephen A. Thomson, Stewart A. Noble and Daniel J. Ricca, the               
          junior party, are not entitled to a patent containing claims 45             
          to 47 corresponding to the count.                                           



                         RONALD H. SMITH               )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         MICHAEL SOFOCLEOUS            ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         MARY F. DOWNEY                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              







                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007