WANG V. TUCHOLSKI - Page 10





          Interference No. 103,036                                                    



               Unpatentability of the Party Burroughs et al.'s Claims                 

                         over Prior Art--Issues (1, 5 and 6)                          

          Issue (1)                                                                   

                    The party Tucholski's opening brief raises the                    

          following five grounds for unpatentability against the parties'             

          claims:                                                                     

          A.  The parties' claims corresponding exactly to the count, i.e.,           

          Wang's claim 54, Tucholski's claim 62, Cataldi's patent claim 20            

          and Burroughs' reissue claim 37, are anticipated by Kiernan, U.S.           

          Patent No. 4,723,656, by Parker, U.S. Patent No. 4,747,020, or by           

          the prior art BatCheck® tester (Tucholski's Exhibit Nos. 46A and            

          47A (TX 46A and 47A)).  [See pages 2 to 8 and 85 of the opening             

          brief.]                                                                     

          B.  The parties Wang's claims 43 to 53 and 55 to 63, Cataldi's              

          patent claims 9 to 19 and 21 to 29, Cataldi's reissue claims 21,            








                                           -10-                                       





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007