THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
RICHARD DEAN and ROBERT W. WEBER
Junior Party1
v.
RICHARD DEAN and ROBERT W. WEBER
Junior Party2
v.
DAVID PARKER and THOMAS A. MILLICAN
Senior Party3
__________
Patent Interference No. 103,056
___________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, DOWNEY and SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judges.
DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINAL DECISION UNDER 37 CFR § 1.658
On August 20, 1998, Parker et al. filed a petition to the Commissioner under 37
1 Application 07/312,767, filed February 17, 1989, now Patent No. 5,053,503,
issued October 1, 1991. Assignee for Centocor.
2 Reissue Application 08/069,529, filed June 1, 1993. Assignee for Centocor.
3 Application 07/577,072, filed August 31, 1990. Accorded benefit of Application
07/372,348, filed June 9, 1989, now abandoned and Application PCTGB88/00671, filed
August 12, 1988, and U.K. Application No. 8819042, filed August 12, 1987.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007