THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL S. LEBBY and CHRISTOPHER K.Y. CHUN
____________
Appeal No. 95-1288
Application No. 07/844,0271
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and DIXON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 16
through 21 and 24 through 27.
The disclosed invention relates to a semiconductor to
optical link. As seen in Figure 1, the link 10 is comprised
1Application for patent filed March 2, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007