THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte STEPHEN H. HUGHES, RAMESH KUMAR
and JOHN BRUMBAUGH
________________
Appeal No. 95-2215
Application 07/920,0131
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ELLIS and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 - 10, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed July 27, 1992. According to appellants, the application
is a continuation of Application 07/484,573, filed February 26, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007