THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WILLIAM PENDERGAST, SCOTT H. DICKERSON,
JULIUS V. JOHNSON and ROBERT FERONE
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2700
Application 07/956,0181
______________
HEARD: December 8, 1998
_______________
Before DOWNEY, KIMLIN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claim 17.
Claims 1-16, the other claims remaining in the present appli-
cation, stand withdrawn from consideration pursuant to a
restriction requirement. A copy of claim 17 is appended to
Application for patent filed January 13, 1993.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007