THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No.
52
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VICTOR P. BUROLLA
____________
Appeal No. 95-3189
Application No. 08/055,4031
____________
HEARD: Apr. 9, 1999
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3-19, 21-23, and 26-32, which are all
of
1Application for patent filed April 29, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/542,673, filed June 22, 1990, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/188,773, filed April
29, 1988, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007