Ex parte LYNN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-3453                                                          
          Application No. 08/125,709                                                  


               Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal              
          and reads as follows:                                                       


               1.  A method of assembling a storage cabinet, comprising               
          the steps of:                                                               
               providing an inner wall defining a storage space, the                  
          inner wall including a first opening;                                       
               positioning an outer wall having a second opening                      
          surrounding said inner wall to define an insulation space                   
          therebetween;                                                               
               installing a wiring harness in said insulation space, the              
          wiring harness comprising a pair of electrical plug-in                      
          connectors and a plurality of conductors extending                          
          therebetween, the installing step comprising inserting one                  
          connector into the first opening and the other connector into               
          the second opening,                                                         
               the above steps being carried out in any order; and                    
                    injecting a foamed-in-place insulation into said                  
          insulation space, said connectors sealing said first opening                
          and said second opening to prevent leakage of the foamed-in-                
          place insulation.                                                           
                                                                                     
               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies on the                 
          following prior art:                                                        
          Kochendorfer                  4,097,096                Jun. 27,             
          1978                                                                        
               Claims 1 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as unpatentable over the Kochendorfer reference.                            

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007