THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MAYAN MOUDGILL
____________
Appeal No. 1995-3690
Application No. 08/000,3421
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and CRAWFORD, Administrative
Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5, and 7 through 9 which are
all
of the claims pending in this application. Claims 4, 6 and
10-26 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed January 4, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007